INTERESTING REPLICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE ORBO CONCEPT BY MR. MILAN MANCIC IN COLLABORATION WITH THE GLOBAL INSTITUTE FOR NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, SHOWING A COP >5
Following the STEORN online streaming demonstration on the 11th January, 2010, a small group of new energy researchers around the world took up the challenge to replicate the ORBO concept in order to determine whether it was really working as per STEORN's claim. Several replications were made around the world and GIFNET encouraged its members to pursue the concept and perhaps even improve it as well as explain it.
Mr. Milan Mancic, who has a long record as a new energy experimenter, has been working in collaboration with GIFNET for many years and we believe that he has achieved, not only a successful replication of the ORBO but also a considerable improvement based on a different principle. In fact, his concept constitutes a new ground-breaking technology that we believe holds a real and present potential for solving the energy problems of our planet by providing abundant clean de-centralized energy to the individual.
The fundamental principle of GIFNET is to share and freely publish all information on useful clean energy technologies and we are therefore happy to present Mr. Mancic's concept to the world hoping to create a global synergy towards bringing clean energy independence to consumers. Only by pooling resources and create open-sourced synergies across the Globe will we be able to bring about the paradigm-shift required for our future generations to survive. The initiative lies with each and everyone of us. Since it is absolutely clear that NO solution will be provided for by the established Energy Industries or their Governments, we each have a moral and a real obligation to search for ways towards achieving clean energy independence for all.
GIFNET is now structuring a multi-disciplinary forum for the advancement and understanding of this new and exciting venture. The aim is to bring together Scientists, Engineers, Inventors, financers, administrators, open-minded politicians and people with good ideas in order to create a new self-organising model towards taking over the responsibility for our future, rather than leave it in the hands of an ailing system that in the past 100 years has almost brought us to the point of no return where no matter what is done is too little and too late.
If you are interested to participate kindly, send us a mail on info@gifnet.org
Nicholas Moller
President, GIFNET
| January 2010. |
Test with 300 mm Radiant MAGNETERNITY Recharger |

30. Jan. 2010.
In this experiment plexiglass 300 mm disc is used, with 5 magnets (62 x 10 N35). Mass of disc is 1750 g

I tested MAGNETERNITY version number 2:

In this version Battery B1 and B2 in serial connetion charge the capacitors 220 microF in serial connection, which in the second step discharge through B2 only, but in a parallel connection of them. In that case B2 gives one amount of the charge, but recives four amounts. For this experiment I used a voltage divider with only two capacitors (but more capacitors can be used). If more capacitores are used, then the ratio of given and recived charge is increased. Batteries 12 V 4.2 Ah UL4.2-12 . One battery for B1 and four batteries for B2 (parallel)
Before the test the batteries were loaded with the 24V/20W bulb for 15 seconds. Voltage at 15 th seconds was 12.11 V for B1 and 11.38 V for B2.
| TIME |
VOLTAGE B1 |
VOLTAGE B2 |
RPM |
| 00.00 |
12.33 |
11.93 |
120 |
| 00.30 |
12.32 |
11.94 |
125 |
| 1.00 |
12.31 |
11.95 |
128 |
End of experiment
The batteries are tested again with the same bulb for a period of 15 seconds.
Voltage is 12.00V battery B1, and B2 battery 11.68 V.
If we convert capacity of the battery into capacity of Capacitors then it would get approximately 600 F capacitance for B1 and 2400 F, B2. This gives us the following results.
Test number 1
| BATTERY |
U start(V) |
U end(V) |
E start(J) |
E end (J) |
E difference |
| B1 |
12.11 |
12.00 |
43995.63 |
43200.00 |
-795.63 |
| B2 |
11.38 |
11.68 |
155405.28 |
163706.88 |
8301.60 |
It gives the excess energy of 7535.97 J or COP> 10
In the next experiment one capacitor 470 uF will be used instead of the voltage divider.

| TIME |
VOLTAGE B1 |
VOLTAGE B2 |
RPM |
| 00.00 |
12.30 |
11.94 |
120 |
| 00.30 |
12.26 |
12.01 |
122 |
| 1.00 |
12.25 |
12.03 |
128 |
End of experiment.
The batteries are tested again with the same bulb for a period of 15 seconds.
Voltage is 11.95V battery B1, and B2 battery 11.78 V.
Test number 2
| BATTERY |
U start( V) |
U end (V) |
E start (J) |
E end (J) |
E difference(J) |
| B1 |
12.00 |
11.95 |
43200.00 |
42840.75 |
-359.25 |
| B2 |
11.68 |
11.78 |
163706.88 |
166522.08 |
2815.20 |
It gives the excess energy of 2455.95 J or COP>7.8
| January 2010. |
Test with 300 mm Radiant Energy Recharger
|

| January 2010. |
Test with AA Batery |

18. Jan. 2010th
This test takes several days. This test explores how long a battery can power the electric motor.AA battery was used which has lost its capacity during the work in some devices, and has long been inused for a long time.
Because of the small current that flows through the coil,transistor was not used as a switch to this scheme, but the reed switch was used directly.

The battery is DURACELL MN1500 AA Alkaline 1.5V LR6
Reed switch labeled KSK1A52-2030th
The body coil is made of polypropylene:

oiled is 16 layers of 50 windings of copper wire 0.4 mm.
Resistance coil is 7 R. Inductance is not measured.
Rotor is made of PVC cover diameter 75 mm and it was installed 4 magnet diameter 20 mm, with a median of 5.1 mm hole diameter. The length of the magnet is 15 mm. Magnets are 1.4 Tesla per square centimetres
Magnetic attach to the plastic lid with screws M5 x 25
This test was carried out several times, the last test before the start of five days. In all tests used the same battery. In previous tests has been investigated, which is the best position reed switch.
After several days of continuous work was a battery voltage of 150 mV to 350 mV.
The first 4 days the test was conducted in the workshop. When I found that the room temperature affects the battery voltage, and thus the rotation of the rotor, then I conveyed the warm room.
Battery voltage during test
| DATE |
TIME |
MIN/mV |
MAX/mV |
DATE |
TIME |
MIN/mV |
MAX/mV |
| 15.Jan. 10 |
22.00 |
262 |
269 |
17.Jan. 10 |
8.00 |
132 |
182 |
| |
23.00 |
245 |
256 |
|
9.00 |
151 |
191 |
| |
24.00 |
222 |
236 |
|
13.00 |
168 |
192 |
| 16.Jan. 10. |
5.00 |
177 |
205 |
|
14.00 |
175 |
200 |
| |
6.00 |
189 |
212 |
|
|
|
|
| |
9.00 |
227 |
242 |
|
Replaced in the warm room |
| |
10.00 |
242 |
252 |
|
|
|
|
| |
13.00 |
265 |
271 |
|
16.00 |
300 |
304 |
| |
15.00 |
251 |
252 |
|
20 |
385 |
388 |
| |
17.00 |
228 |
242 |
|
|
|
|
| |
18.00 |
223 |
238 |
|
|
|
|
| |
20.00 |
209 |
225 |
|
|
|
|
At night, when the heat was off battery voltage in the room began to fall.
The next morning, with the inclusion of heating, increased the battery voltage. During the day the battery voltage increased and fell in line with automatic on / off heating in the room. Rotor rotation was from 40 to 100 RPM depending on the battery voltage.
DATE |
TIME |
MIN/mV |
MAX/mV |
18.Jan. 10. |
8.00 |
285 |
290 |
|
9.00 |
309 |
311 |
|
10.00 |
318 |
319 |
|
11.00 |
338 |
338 |
|
12.00 |
339 |
340 |
|
13.00 |
330 |
331 |
|
14.00 |
319 |
321 |
|
15.00 |
327 |
328 |
|
16.00 |
309 |
311 |
|
17.00 |
319 |
320 |
|
18.00 |
301 |
303 |
|
20.00 |
299 |
300 |
| DATE |
TIME |
MIN/mV |
MAX/mV |
|
TIME |
MIN/mV |
MAX/mV |
| 19.Jan.10. |
6.00 |
202 |
218 |
|
18.00 |
167 |
181 |
| |
8.00 |
246 |
252 |
|
19.00 |
163 |
180 |
| |
9.00 |
251 |
256 |
|
20.00 |
156 |
172 |
| |
10.00 |
249 |
254 |
|
21.00 |
156 |
173 |
| |
11.00 |
239 |
247 |
|
22.00 |
143 |
162 |
| |
12.00 |
247 |
252 |
|
23.00 |
259 |
262 |
| |
13.00 |
246 |
253 |
|
|
|
|
| |
14.00 |
234 |
242 |
|
|
|
|